Wednesday 7 December 2016
Companions of prophet [PBUH] in the perspective of Shia Imams [AS]
ID: 423 Publish Date: 29 August 2016 - 13:24 Count Views: 160
Speeches » public
Companions of prophet [PBUH] in the perspective of Shia Imams [AS]

Companions of prophet [PBUH] in the perspective of Shia Imams [AS]

The view of Imam “Sadiq” [AS] about our behavior towards Sunni

«تَنْظُرُونَ إِلَی أَئِمَّتِکمُ الَّذِینَ تَقْتَدُونَ بِهِمْ فَتَصْنَعُونَ مَا یصْنَعُونَفَوَ اللَّهِ إِنَّهُمْ لَیعُودُونَ مَرْضَاهُمْ وَ یشْهَدُونَ جَنَائِزَهُمْ وَ یقِیمُونَ الشَّهَادَةَ لَهُمْ وَ عَلَیهِمْ وَ یؤَدُّونَ الْأَمَانَةَ إِلَیهِمْ

Imam [AS] has said: see how you Imams behave Sunni and you do so, swear to god when Sunnis get sick, your Imams will visit them, and after dying, your Imams will attend their funeral procession, when they need witness at court, they will witness for them, if they give something to your Imams as trust they will keep it for them.

Al-Kafi, “Kulayni” v 2, p 636

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] says:

اقْرَأْ عَلَی مَنْ تَرَی أَنَّهُ یطِیعُنِی مِنْهُمْ وَ یأْخُذُ بِقَوْلِی السَّلَامَ وَ أُوصِیکم صِلُوا عَشَائِرَکمْ وَ اشْهَدُوا جَنَائِزَهُمْ وَ عُودُوا مَرْضَاهُمْ وَ أَدُّوا حُقُوقَهُم فَإِنَّ الرَّجُلَ مِنْکمْ إِذَا وَرِعَ فِی دِینِهِ وَ صَدَقَ الْحَدِیثَ وَ أَدَّی الْأَمَانَة «وَ حَسُنَ خُلُقُهُ مَعَ النَّاسِ قِیلَ هَذَا جَعْفَرِی فَیسُرُّنِی ذَلِک «وَ یدْخُلُ عَلَی مِنْهُ السُّرُورُ وَ قِیلَ هَذَا أَدَبُ جَعْفَر

Say hello to Shias for us who listen to us and obey us and say: attend Sunnis’ funeral procession, visit their patients, pay their dues, behave them gently. If you do so they’ll say: he’s the disciple of Imam “Sadiq” [AS]and this act of you will make us happy, I’ll get happy of your good behavior towards Sunni and they will say: Imam “Sadiq” [AS] has treated these guys well.

Al-Kafi, “Kulayni”, v 2, p 636

The view of commander of faithful [AS] about Sahabah

لَقَدْ رَأَیتُ أَصْحَابَ مُحَمَّدٍ فَمَا أَرَی أَحَداً یشْبِهُهُمْ مِنْکمْلَقَدْ کانُوا یصْبِحُونَ شُعْثاً غُبْراً وَ قَدْ بَاتُوا سُجَّداً وَ قِیاماً یرَاوِحُونَ‌بَینَ جِبَاهِهِمْ وَ خُدُودِهِمْ وَ یقِفُونَ عَلَی مِثْلِ الْجَمْرِ مِنْ ذِکرِ مَعَادِهِمْ

I saw the companions of prophet [PBUH] and not of them were like the companions of prophet. They’d worship all the night and sign of fatigue was clear in their face due to worshiping, when they wanted to sleep they would sleep while reminding god.

Nahj al-Blaghah, sermon 97

Sahabah in perspective of Imam “Sajjad” [AS]

«اللَّهُمَّ وَ أَصْحَابُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَاصَّةً الَّذِینَ أَحْسَنُوا الصَّحَابَةَ وَ الَّذِینَ أَبْلَوُا الْبَلَاءَ الْحَسَنَ فِی نَصْرِهِ

God, companions of prophet [PBUH], those who endured problems due to helping prophet and were companion in the real sense of word.

Al-Sahifah Al-Sajjadiyah, p 43

Those who discuss the matter of unity and respect Sahabah should know that we don’t believe that al companions were just, this what “Quran” proves it too, “Quran” says decisively:

یا أَیهَا الَّذِینَ آمَنُوا إِنْ جاءَکمْ فاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَینُوا

Believers, if an evildoer brings you a piece of news, inquire first, in case you should unwittingly wrong others and then repent of what you have done.

Sura AL-HUJRAAT, verse 6

إِنَّ الَّذِینَ یؤْذُونَ اللَّهَ وَ رَسُولَهُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ فِی الدُّنْیا وَ الْآخِرَةِ وَ أَعَدَّ لَهُمْ عَذاباً مُهِینا

Those who (try to) hurt Allah and His Messenger shall be cursed by Allah in this present life and in the Everlasting Life, and He has prepared for them a humbling punishment.

Sura AL-AHZAB, verse 57

We divided companions [Sahabah] to two parts:

1: those who were just and would obey Prophet Muhammad [PBUH] and didn’t disagree him and as Sheikh “Tusi” says: we expect them to intercede us.

Companions who annoyed prophet [PBUH], those who made 70 dear companions of prophet [PBUH] to get martyred in the battle of “Ohud”, those who would stand against prophet’s order, as prophet has said they were sinful, we don’t know them as righteous.

“Ayeshah” who’s very respectable to Sunni, says to Prophet [PBUH]:

من أَغْضَبَک أَغْضَبَهُ اللَّهُ

O Prophet, who’s made you angry? Shall god makes him angry.

2: another part of companions who were in majority, and followed commander of faithful [AS], we respect them and are dear to us

It’s written in the book “Al-Amali” from sheikh “Tusi”:

شَهِدَ مَعَ عَلِی (عَلَیهِ السَّلَامُ) یوْمَ الْجَمَلِ ثَمَانُونَ مِنْ أَهْلِ بَدْرٍ «وَ أَلْفٌ وَ خَمْسُ مِائَةٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ]صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَ آلِهِ”[

80 companions out of companions who attended the battle of “Badr” followed Ali [AS] and 1500 companions of prophet [PBUH] attended the battle of “Jmal” along with commander of faithful [AS].

Al-amali, “Tusi”, p 726

“Zahabi” writes in the book “Islam history”, v 1

«وقال سعید بن جبیر: کان مع علی یوم وقعة الجمل ثمانمائة من الأنصار وأربعمائة ممن شهدوا بیعة الرضوان»

“Saed ibn Jubair” says: 800 members of “Ansar” and 400 members of those who had attended “Rizvan” allegiance were along with commander of faithful “Ali” [AS].

Shabah from the perspective of Imam “Sadiq” [AS]

فَأَخْبِرْنِی عَنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَدَقُوا عَلَی مُحَمَّدٍ أَمْ کذَبُواقَالَ بَلْ صَدَقُوا

Were the companions of prophet [PBUH] honest towards him or lair? Imam said: they were Honest

Al-Kafi, “kuleini”, v 1, p 65

«عَنْ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنْ آبَائِهِ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَثْبَتُکمْ عَلَی الصِّرَاطِ أَشَدُّکمْ حُبّاً لِأَهْلِ بَیتِی وَ لِأَصْحَابِی

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] has quoted of prophet [PBUH: those who are can go through the bridge of “Sirat” and wouldn’t fall in the Hell are those who’re so kind towards my “Ahl al-Bayt” and companions

Bihar al-Anvar, al-Allamah Majlisi, v 27, p 133

کانَ أَصْحَابُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ اثْنَی عَشَرَ أَلْفاً” «ثَمَانِیةُ آلَافٍ مِنَ الْمَدِینَةِ وَ أَلْفَانِ مِنْ مَکةَ وَ أَلْفَانِ مِنَ الطُّلَقَاءِ وَ لَمْ یرَ فِیهِمْ قَدَرِی وَ لَا مُرْجِئٌ وَ لَا حَرُورِی وَ لَا مُعْتَزِلِی «وَ لَا صَاحِبُ رَأْی کانُوا یبْکونَ اللَّیلَ وَ النَّهَارَ وَ یقُولُونَ اقْبِضْ أَرْوَاحَنَا مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ نَأْکلَ خُبْزَ الْخَمِیرِ

The companions of prophet [PBUH] who’re respectable to us are twelve thousands members. Eight thousand of them were from “Medina”, 2000 thousand of them were from “Mecca” and 2000 of them were from “Talqa’”, neither people from “Qadari” amongst them nor any one from “Khavarij” nor from “Mu’tazilah”, these guys weren’t opinionated, they would cry day and night and say: god get our soul before we stray.

Al-khisal,” ibn Babivayh”, v 2, p 640

Do Shias believe that all companions got apostate, after the death of Prophet [PBUH?!

Another issue that must be discussed is what “Wahhabbi” experts say: “Shias have told that all people other than four or five guys got apostate after the death of prophet [PBUH].”

The view of “Ayesha” prophet’s spouse

عَنْ عَائِشَةَ قَالَتْ: لَمَّا قُبِضَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَسَلَّمَ ارْتَدَتِ الْعَرَبُ قَاطِبَةً وَاشْرَأَبَّ النِّفَاقُ

It’s been quoted from “Ayesha” that when prophet [PBUH] passed away, all Arabs got apostate and dissention was made amongst companions.

Al-bidayah and al-Nahayah, “ibn kathir”, v 9, p 422

The view of “Abu Hurairah” most famous Sunni narrator:

«أن أبا هریرة رضی الله عنه تلا: (“إِذا جاءَ نَصْرُ اللَّهِ وَ الْفَتْحُ وَ رَأَیتَ النَّاسَ یدْخُلُونَ فِی دِینِ اللَّهِ أَفْواجا فقال: "والذی نفسی بیده إن الناس لیخرجون الیوم من دینهم أفواجا کما دخلوا فیه أفواجا

after reciting this verse: “When the victory of Allah and the opening comes/ and you see people embracing the Religion of Allah in throngs”. “Abu Hurairah” said: swear to god, whom my life is in his hands, today Muslims leave the religion of god throngs as they embraced the religion of god throngs at the time of prophet [PBUH].

Mufid al-Mustafid, “ Muhammad ibn Abd al wahhab”, v 1, p 322

Sahabah in the perspective of Prophet Muhammad [PBUH]

عَنِ النَّبِی قَالَ «لَیرِدَنَّ عَلَی نَاسٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِی الْحَوْضَ حَتَّی عَرَفْتُهُمُ اخْتُلِجُوا دُونِی فَأَقُولُ أَصْحَابِی فَیقُولُ لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثُوا بَعْدَک

Prophet [PBUH] says: some of my companions will come to me next to “Kawthar” pool, then they’re fended off  and are taken towards “Hell”, I’ll say: god they were my companions why’re you take them away? God will say: prophet, you don’t what innovations they made after you.

Sahih Bukhari, v 21, p 488

Narratives that shut the mouth of “Wahhabism” for ever

طُوبَی لَک صَحِبْتَ النَّبِی وَبَایعْتَهُ تَحْتَ الشَّجَرَةِ فَقَالَ یا ابْنَ أَخِی إِنَّک لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثْنَا بَعْدَهُ

Good for you, you were companion of prophet [PBUH] and attended “Rizvan” allegiance, O, my niece you don’t know what innovations they made after prophet [PBuh].

The method of Imam “Sadiq” [AS] for fighting doubt makers

There’re two points here: first: we have narratives from Imam “Sadiq” [AS] that he would encourage and provoke Shias for answering the doubts made by hypocrites, “Khavarij” and “infidels” and others who make doubt:

 «عُلَمَاءُ شِیعَتِنَا مُرَابِطُونَ بِالثَّغْرِ الَّذِی یلِی إِبْلِیسُ وَ عَفَارِیتُهُ یمْنَعُونَهُمْ «یمْنَعُونَهُمْ عَنِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَی ضُعَفَاءِ شِیعَتِنَا وَ عَنْ أَنْ یتَسَلَّطَ عَلَیهِمْ إِبْلِیسُ وَ شِیعَتُهُ النَّوَاصِب «أَلَا فَمَنِ انْتَصَبَ لِذَلِک مِنْ شِیعَتِنَا کانَ أَفْضَلَ مِمَّنْ جَاهَدَ الرُّومَ وَ التُّرْک وَ الْخَزَرَ أَلْفَ أَلْفِ مَرَّةٍ لِأَنَّهُ یدْفَعُ عَنْ أَدْیانِ مُحِبِّینَا وَ ذَلِک یدْفَعُ عَنْ أَبْدَانِهِمْ

Our Shia scholars are margraves who watch devils and don’t let evils and infidels to dominate our Shias and youth who don’t have firm belief. Anyone who works on the field of defending Shiite and answering the doubts, their reword is higher than one Million soldier and warrior fighting on the battle field. Because they defend the religion of our lovers but the other one defends his body.

Bihar al-Anvar, v 2, p 5

Imam Sadiq [AS] says:

مَنْ کانَ هَمُّهُ فِی کسْرِ النَّوَاصِبِ عَنِ الْمَسَاکینِ مِنْ شِیعَتِنَا الْمُوَالِینَ لَنَا أَهْلَ الْبَیتِ یکسِرُهُمْ عَنْهُمْ وَ یکشِفُ عَنْ مَخَازِیهِمْ وَ یبَینُ عَوْرَاتِهِمْ” «وَ یفَخِّمُ أَمْرَ مُحَمَّدٍ وَ آلِهِ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَیهِمْ جَعَلَ اللَّهُ هِمَّةَ أَمْلَاک الْجِنَانِ فِی بِنَاءِ قُصُورِهِ وَ دُورِهِ یسْتَعْمِلُ بِکلِّ حَرْفٍ مِنْ حُرُوفِ حُجَجِهِ عَلَی أَعْدَاءِ اللَّهِ أَکثَرَ مِنْ عَدَدِ أَهْلِ الدُّنْیا أَمْلَاکاً قُوَّةُ کلِّ وَاحِدٍ تَفْضُلُ عَنْ حَمْلِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَ الْأَرْضِ

Each one of our Shias who defends “Ahl al-Bayt” against “Khavarij” and “Infidels” and breaks their back and humiliates and decries them, god almighty will establish the best castles for them and give them the best luxury homes in the paradise, in exchange for defending “Ahl al-Bayt” and decrying evil “Wahhabism” and infidels. And any word that they say defending Shia and answering doubts, god will do them favor as much as all people’s wealth.

Bihar al-Anvar, v 2, p 10

significant “Fatwas” of Sunni scholars!

«من تَزَوَّجَ أُمَّهُ آلتی وَلَدَتْهُ وَابْنَتَهُ وَأُخْتَه وَجَدَّتَهُ وَعَمَّتَهُ وَخَالَتَهُ وَبِنْتَ أَخِیهِ وَبِنْتَ أُخْتِهِ عَالِمًا بِقَرَابَتِهِنَّ منه عَالِمًا بِتَحْرِیمِهِنَّ علیه” “وَوَطِئَهُنَّ کلَّهُنَّ  فَالْوَلَدُ لا حق بِهِ وَالْمَهْرُ وَاجِبٌ لَهُنَّ علیه وَلَیسَ علیه إِلاَّ التَّعْزِیرُ “

 If anyone marries his biological mother or his daughter, sister, grandmother, aunt or his niece, while he’s aware of family relationship with them and knows that marring these relatives is forbidden, if he marries and sleeps with them and gives birth to a baby, that baby isn’t adulterous and belongs to him and he should pay her dowry, and he’ll be punished according to the verdict of judge.

Al-Mahalli, “ibn Hazm” v 11, p 253

“Kashani Hanafi” says in the book “Badae’al-Sanae’” v 7, p 35

 «إذَا نَکحَ مَحَارِمَهُ أو الْخَامِسَةَ أو أُخْتَ امْرَأَتِهِ فَوَطِئَهَا لَا حَدَّ علیه عِنْدَ أبی حَنِیفَةَ وَإِنْ عَلِمَ بِالْحُرْمَةِ وَعَلَیهِ التَّعْزِیرُ

If someone marries his first degree relatives [mother, sister, niece, daughter, grandmother, aunt] and sleeps with hem, and he knows that it’s Haram, comply with the “Fatwa” of “Abu Hanifah” Islamic punishment [Hadd] is not applied.

And he says in the page 156

«وَلاَ یحُدُّونَ واطیء (((واطئ))) الْبَهِیمَةِ وَکلُّ ذلک إبَاحَةُ فَرْجٍ بِالْبَاطِلِوَلاَ یحُدُّونَ آلتی تزنی وَهِی عَاقِلَةٌ بَالِغَةٌ مُخْتَارَةٌ بِصَبِی لم یبْلُغْ وَیحُدُّونَ الرَّجُلَ إذَا زَنَی بِصَبِیةٍ من سِنِّ ذلک الصَّبِی

If someone sleeps with an animal, Islamic punishment isn’t applied on him/her, Same goes to a woman who sleeps with a dog

Al-mahalli, “ibnHazm”, v 11, p 153

Presenter:

Greeting to you dear viewer of “Velayat” global channel and good followers of the program “Habl al-Matin”. Our last session’s discussion about the bright prestige of Imam “Sadiq” remained unfinished and we promised you to continue our discussion in the next program. Our dear master “Ayatollah Qazvini” is here to continue our discussion, greeting to you dear master,

Ayatollah “Qazvini”:

I express my sincere greeting to you and all dear viewers who are watching us.

Presenter:

Master, one of matters that “Wahhabis” discuss is that Shias curse at Sahabah [companions], “Wahhabis” ascribe insults to Shia; while the leader of our faith, Imam “Sadiq” [AS] quite disagrees with this act.

I ask you telling us the view of Imam “Sadiq” [AS] as the chief of shia sect about Sahabah, as well as the view of Shia Famous scholars about companions.

Ayatollah “Qazvini”

Discussing about this matter is necessary. Nowadays evil “Wahhabis” try to make difference amongst Shiite and Sunni by quoting some issues or some weak narrative [a narrative thatall or some of its narrators aren’t reliable] in Shia books,

Nowadays there’s crisis in some Islamic countries and “Wahhabis” try to get force for “ISIL”. These guys have been hired and it’s their only target. When someone calls “Wahhaabism” channels asking for studying the document, they begin insulting. I said in last program, Shia brothers who watch our program, if they don’t have enough information and knowledge they shouldn’t call evil “Wahhabism” channels. Shias who call these them have definitely holy targets and want to defend Shia, but when they can’t answer them due to lack of having enough knowledge, they’ll undermine the reputation of Shia and Imam Sadiq’s [AS] doctrine.

I’ve said a lot that when someone doesn’t know the principles of Shia shouldn’t call these evil channels. They use of your contact to weaken Shia sect.

Imam “Askari” [AS] has said about Shias who discuss opponents without enough knowledge:

«فَذَلِک حَرَامٌ عَلَی شِیعَتِنَا أَنْ یصِیرُوا فِتْنَةً عَلَی ضُعَفَاءِ إِخْوَانِهِمْ وَ عَلَی الْمُبْطِلِین»

Our Shias do illegitimate deeds and it makes some Shia adolescents who don’t have enough information to face doubt.

Bihar al-Anvar, “Majlisi” v 2, p 125

It’s illegitimate and Haram for someone who can’t discuss with them scientifically to call these “Wahhabism” Channels.

These dears should first learn the alphabetic of Shia principles; or should at least call the experts of “Velayat” global network and ask their questions. Our friends are at you service at any time. “Wahhabi” experts always scare of debating with Shia experts; because they know it’s equal with decrying and it causes “Saudi Arabia” authorities wouldn’t help them financially. So “Wahhabi” experts want to give Shias third degree. As you mentioned these guys want to say that Shias insult and curse at companions of prophet [PBUH] and believe that they got apostate.

I mention to two points, I ask dear Shias and youths who love “Ahl al-Bayt” [AS] and want to call these evil channels to listen carefully.

I said in last session that when Imam “Sadiq” [AS] was asked: O son of prophet [PBUH], how would we behave Sunni? Imam [AS] said:

«تَنْظُرُونَ إِلَی أَئِمَّتِکمُ الَّذِینَ تَقْتَدُونَ بِهِمْ فَتَصْنَعُونَ مَا یصْنَعُونَ»«فَوَ اللَّهِ إِنَّهُمْ لَیعُودُونَ مَرْضَاهُمْ وَ یشْهَدُونَ جَنَائِزَهُمْ وَ یقِیمُونَ الشَّهَادَةَ لَهُمْ وَ عَلَیهِمْ وَ یؤَدُّونَ الْأَمَانَةَ إِلَیهِمْ

See how your Imams [AS] behave Sunni, you take pattern from them. Swear to god when Sunnis get sick, your Imams visit them and….

Al-kafi, v2, p 636

It has been the manner of Shia Imams [AS].

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] says in another narrative:

«اقْرَأْ عَلَی مَنْ تَرَی أَنَّهُ یطِیعُنِی مِنْهُمْ وَ یأْخُذُ بِقَوْلِی السَّلَامَ وَ أُوصِیکم صِلُوا عَشَائِرَکمْ وَ اشْهَدُوا جَنَائِزَهُمْ وَ عُودُوا مَرْضَاهُمْ وَ أَدُّوا حُقُوقَهُم فَإِنَّ الرَّجُلَ مِنْکمْ إِذَا وَرِعَ فِی دِینِهِ وَ صَدَقَ الْحَدِیثَ وَ أَدَّی الْأَمَانَة وَ حَسُنَ خُلُقُهُ مَعَ النَّاسِ قِیلَ هَذَا جَعْفَرِی فَیسُرُّنِی ذَلِک وَ یدْخُلُ عَلَی مِنْهُ السُّرُورُ وَ قِیلَ هَذَا أَدَبُ جَعْفَر

I’ve not said this narrative, this is what Imam Sadiq [AS] has said to Shias about their behavior towards Sunni. If you want to make your Imam, practice what he says. This narrative is for second century not today or yesterday.

The book “Kafi” is from late “Kuleini” died in 329 AD, and he himself hasn’t written this book; narratives collected in this book have been written at the time Shia Imams [AS]

In fact late “Kulini” has collected 400 principles written at the time of Shiite Imams [AS], briefly in the book “Kafi”.

The view of Commander of faithful [AS] about Sahabah:

«لَقَدْ رَأَیتُ أَصْحَابَ مُحَمَّدٍ فَمَا أَرَی أَحَداً یشْبِهُهُمْ مِنْکمْ "لَقَدْ کانُوا یصْبِحُونَ شُعْثاً غُبْراً وَ قَدْ بَاتُوا سُجَّداً وَ قِیاماً یرَاوِحُونَ‌ "بَینَ جِبَاهِهِمْ وَ خُدُودِهِمْ وَ یقِفُونَ عَلَی مِثْلِ الْجَمْرِ مِنْ ذِکرِ مَعَادِهِمْ

I saw the companions of prophet, not of you are like them, they’d worship all the night and …

 Nahg al-Balaghah, sermon 97

Companions in the perspective of Imam “Sajjad” [AS]

Imam “Sajjad” has said issues in this regard in the book “Shifah Sajjadiyah”, we’ll quote them as proof for both radical Shias and “Wahhabi” experts!

Imam “Sajjad” [AS] says in “Sahifah Sajjadiyah” p 43

اللَّهُمَّ وَ أَصْحَابُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَاصَّةً الَّذِینَ أَحْسَنُوا الصَّحَابَةَ وَ الَّذِینَ أَبْلَوُا الْبَلَاءَ الْحَسَنَ فِی نَصْرِهِ

And there’s a narrative in the book “Bihar al-anvar” v 87, p 188

اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَی مُحَمَّدٍ خَاتَمِ النَّبِیینَ وَ تَمَامِ عِدَّةِ الْمُرْسَلِینَ وَ عَلَی آلِهِ الطَّیبِینَ الطَّاهِرِینَ وَ أَصْحَابِهِ الْمُنْتَجَبِینَ

Sheikh “TUSI” writes in the book “Misbah al-Mujtahid”:

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَی مُحَمَّدٍ وَ أَهْلِ بَیتِهِ الطَّیبِینَ وَ عَلَی أَصْحَابِهِ الْمُنْتَجَبِینَ وَ عَلَی أَزْوَاجِهِ الْمُطَهَّرَاتِ»

“Wahhabi” channel experts who keep showing “weak” narratives to people, should see these narratives too! At least say that “these narratives are in Shia books as well”.

 We don’t accept that all companions were just

Those who discuss the matter of unity and and respect “Sahabah” should know that we don’t accept that all companions are righteous, holy “Quran” proves it as well:

(یا أَیهَا الَّذِینَ آمَنُوا إِنْ جاءَکمْ فاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَینُوا)

 sura AL-HUJRAAT, verse 6

(إِنَّ الَّذِینَ یؤْذُونَ اللَّهَ وَ رَسُولَهُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ فِی الدُّنْیا وَ الْآخِرَةِ وَ أَعَدَّ لَهُمْ عَذاباً مُهِینا) 

Those who (try to) hurt Allah and His Messenger shall be cursed by Allah in this present life and in the Everlasting Life, and He has prepared for them a humbling punishment

sura AL-AHZAB, verse 57

All interpreters say that this verse was sent down about companions whose their name is in the hadith “Ashrah mubashirah” [a hadith [quoted in Sunni resources] in which prophet [PBUH] promised ten of companions entering the paradise].

 As for “Hudaybiyyah” peace, “Umm Salamah” quotes: when prophet [PBUH] said: put out your “Ihram” clothing [wearing Ihram clothing is one of “Hajj” deeds] and slay ship, one person didn’t accept, prophet got upset and went to “Umm Salamah”.

“Umm Salamah” said to prophet [PBUH]: who’s made you angry?! Shall god throw him to the Hell. We can’t say that “the mother of believers “Umm Salamh” was wrong.

At the time of “Hajj” [the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca that takes place in the last month of the year, and that all Muslims are expected to make at least once during their lifetime] , when prophet Muhammad told companions to put out their “Ihram” clothing, refuge to god, they ridiculed him and said things that I feel ashamed to mention them

It wasn’t “Jews” and “Nasara” [Christians who didn’t embrace Islam] and infidels who attended “Hajj” but prophet’s [PBUH] companions were along with prophet [PBUH], we don’t know them as righteous, however these companions are in minority.

Most of companions [Sahabah] are respectable for us

Another group of Sahabah who was in majority and followed commander of faithful Ali [AS], we respect them in high regard. It’s written in the book “Amali” from Sheikh “TUSI”:

شَهِدَ مَعَ عَلِی (عَلَیهِ السَّلَامُ) یوْمَ الْجَمَلِ ثَمَانُونَ مِنْ أَهْلِ بَدْرٍ وَ أَلْفٌ وَ خَمْسُ مِائَةٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَ آلِهِ

“ZAHABI” says:

«وقال سعید بن جبیر: کان مع علی یوم وقعة الجمل ثمانمائة من الأنصار وأربعمائة ممن شهدوا بیعة الرضوان»«شهد مع علی یوم الجمل مائة وثلاثون بدریا وسبعمائة من أصحاب النبی صلی الله علیه و سلم»«وقتل بینهما ثلاثون ألفا»

“Saed ibn Jubair” says: eight hundred of “Ansar” and four hundred of those who attended “Rizvan” allegiance were the followers of “Ali” [AS], one hundred and thirty warriors of battle of “Badr” followed him, and thirty thousand died in battle of “Jamal”.

Islam history, “ZAHABI”, V 3, P 484

“MASUDI” says:

«وکان ممن شهد صفین مع علی من أصحاب بدر سبعة وثمانون رجلاً»«منهم سبعة عشر من المهاجرین، وسبعون من الأنصار»«وشهد معه من الأنصار ممن بایع تحت الشجرة وهی بیعة الرضوان من المهاجرین والأنصار من أصحاب رسول الله تسعمائة»«وکان جمیع من شهد معه من الصحابة ألفینا وثمانمائة»

…. In total, 2800 companions of prophet [PBUH] followed commander of faithful [AS]

Murooj al-zahab, “Masudi”, v 1, p 314

All these companions are respectful to us and we ask god to elevate their positions and we expect

them to intercede us. Nonsense tellers of “Wahhabi” channels who say that Shias believe that after Prophet [PBUH] all people except three persons, shall answer these narratives and issues. If you’re not really beast fly, read these issues and say that these issues are in Shia books either.

Presenter:

Master, they might expect us to call those who were companions and did stand against commander of faithful [AS] in the battles of “Badr”, “Ohod” and “Nahravan”, righteous; while this is inappropriate expectation.

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”

Yes it is, Prophet [PBUH] says:

«یا عَلِی حَرْبُک حَرْبِی وَ حَرْبِی حَرْبُ اللَّهِ »

O “Ali” fighting you, is like fighting me and fighting me is fighting god.

Bihar al-Anvar, V 26, P 348

«قَالَ: رَسُولُ اللَّهِ: «مَنْ فَارَقَنِی فَقَدْ فَارَقَ اللَّهَ وَ مَنْ فَارَقَ عَلِیاً فَقَدْ فَارَقَنِی»

Anyone who leaves me has left god. And anyone leaves “Ali” has left me.

Al-mustadrak, Hakim Nishapuri, V 3, P 133

Not only we don’t ask forgiveness for these companions, but we according to our successive narratives they’re strayed. It’s quite clear that commander of faithful [AS] fought “Nakithin”, “Qasitin” and “Mariqin” [those who Ali [AS] fought them in the battles “Jamal”,”siffin” and “ khavarij”]

We asked “Wahhabis” who don’t have clear parentage: if you were alive at the time of “Siffin” battle, would you join Ali’s [AS] army or “Muawiyyah”? he said: I’d join Ali’s [AS] army.

Then we asked him if you were in Ali’s [AS] army and he had told you to kill “Muawiyyah”, after killing, would you have killed heavenly “muawiyyah” or hellish one? They didn’t have any answer to say, we asked them a lot but they had not thing to say.

If he was believer and you killed him, so you’ll go to the hell:

وَ مَنْ یقْتُلْ مُؤْمِناً مُتَعَمِّداً فَجَزاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خالِداً فی‌ها

The recompense for he who kills a believer deliberately is Hell, he is eternal there. Allah will be angry with him and will curse him and prepare for him a great punishment.

Sura AL-NISA, verse 93

If “Muawiyyah” was infidel, so why do you say: “Muawiyyah” {may god be pleased of him}

They say in quite obscenity: “Ali” [AS] is responsible for anyone who was killed in the battles of “Jamal” and “Siffin”.

If “Ali” [AS] is the responsible for their blood so you’ve no wright to join his army. So if you do so their blood is upon you too.

“Wahhabis” talk so irrelevant that it’s clear they want to show and prove their enmity towards commander of faithful [AS]. I’m wondering what kind of human they are.

We’re sure that if Commander of faithful [AS] gets revived and “Muawiyyah” stands against him, all these guys will join “Muawiyyah” and fight “Ali“ [AS]!!

Swear to god if “Ali” [AS] says: destroys the grave of “Muawiyyah”, all of them will draw their swords fighting “Ali” [AS].

“Alush” who went to the Hell, said: we want to establish “Bani Umayyad” reign in the province of “Sham”. He said clearly: we’ll kill Shias, we’re thirsty to Shias’ blood.

The view of Imam “Sadiq” [AS] about Sahabah

Imam [AS] was asked:

«فَأَخْبِرْنِی عَنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَدَقُوا عَلَی مُحَمَّدٍ أَمْ کذَبُواقَالَ بَلْ صَدَقُوا

Companions of prophet [PBUH] were honest towards him or liar? Imam [AS] said: they were honest.

Al-Kafi, “Kuleini”, V 1, P 65

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] says about companions :

«صل علی محمد عبدک ورسولک، وعلی آله وأصحابه المنتجبین»

Al-Sahifah al-Sadeqiyah, sheikh “Baqir Sarif al-Qurashi”, p 248

«ارْتَدَّ النَّاسُ بَعْدَ النَّبِی إِلَّا ثَلَاثَةَ نَفَر»

After prophet [PBUH] passed away, all companions got apostate other than three persons.

Bihar al-Anvar, “Majlisi”, V 34, P 274

Late “KULEINI” says in the book “Kafi” v 2, p 41:

«وَ قَالَ وَ السَّابِقُونَ الْأَوَّلُونَ مِنَ الْمُهاجِرِینَ وَ الْأَنْصارِ وَ الَّذِینَ اتَّبَعُوهُمْ بِإِحْسانٍ رَضِی اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَ رَضُوا عَنْهُ»

God said: first Outstrippers of “Ansar” and “Migrants” and those who follow them, god is pleased of them and they’re pleased of god [as well]

Then he says:

«فَبَدَأَ بِالْمُهَاجِرِینَ الْأَوَّلِینَ عَلَی دَرَجَةِ سَبْقِهِمْ»

God has praised” first outstrippers in “Quran” based on outstripping each other towards believing in prophet [PBUH].

«ثُمَّ ثَنَّی بِالْأَنْصَارِ»

Then god has praised “Ansar”.

«ثُمَّ ثَلَّثَ بِالتَّابِعِینَ لَهُمْ بِإِحْسَانٍ»

And after them, god’s admired those who follow “Migrants” and “Ansar”.

«فَوَضَعَ کلَّ قَوْمٍ عَلَی قَدْرِ دَرَجَاتِهِمْ وَ مَنَازِلِهِمْ عِنْدَهُ »

God has praised anyone as much as his/her position.

God’s praised those who’ve positions and those who didn’t have position are libertine. Companions who clear instances of this verse:

إِنْ جاءَکمْ فاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَینُوا

Believers, if an evildoer brings you a piece of news, inquire first,

Sura AL-HUJRRAT, verse 6

And as well as companions who are the instance of this holy verse:

وَ إِذا رَأَوْا تِجارَةً أَوْ لَهْواً انْفَضُّوا إِلَیها وَ تَرَکوک قائِما

Yet when they see some commerce or amusement they flock to it, leaving you standing.

Sura AL-JUMUA, verse 11

Certainly, Imam Sadiq [AS] won’t ask forgiveness for these guys! There’s a narrative from Imam “Ali” [AS] in the book “Bihar al-Anvar” V 22, P 306

«أُوصِیکمْ بِأَصْحَابِ نَبِیکم» «لَا تَسُبُّوهُمْ» «وَ هُمُ الَّذِینَ لَمْ یحْدِثُوا بَعْدَهُ حَدَثاً» «وَ لَمْ یؤْوُوا مُحْدِثاً» «فَإِنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَوْصَی بِهِم»

I advice you to respect prophet Muhammad [PBUH], don’t curse at them, those who didn’t get involved with innovations after prophet [PBUH], and didn’t give shelter to innovators, prophet [PBUH] has willed us to respect these guys.

These issues are in the book “Bihar al-Anvar”, why “Wahhabis” don’t discuss them?!

Another narrative of Imam “Sadiq” [AS] about respecting Sahabah!

«عَنْ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنْ آبَائِهِ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَثْبَتُکمْ عَلَی الصِّرَاطِ أَشَدُّکمْ حُبّاً لِأَهْلِ بَیتِی وَ لِأَصْحَابِی»

Imam Sadiq quotes from prophet [PBUH]: those who can pass through the bridge of “Sirat” [on the day of resurrection] and won’t fall in the Hell, are those who do my “Ahl al-Bayt” and companions much favor.

Bihar al-Anvar, “Allamah MAJLISI”, v27, P 133

And it’s been quoted from imam Sadiq “AS” in the book “Khisal” written by Sheikh “Saduq”:

«کانَ أَصْحَابُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ اثْنَی عَشَرَ أَلْفاًثَمَانِیةُ آلَافٍ مِنَ الْمَدِینَةِ وَ أَلْفَانِ مِنْ مَکةَ وَ أَلْفَانِ مِنَ الطُّلَقَاءِ وَ لَمْ یرَ فِیهِمْ قَدَرِی وَ لَا مُرْجِئٌ وَ لَا حَرُورِی وَ لَا مُعْتَزِلِی وَ لَا صَاحِبُ رَأْی کانُوا یبْکونَ اللَّیلَ وَ النَّهَارَ وَ یقُولُونَ اقْبِضْ أَرْوَاحَنَا مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ نَأْکلَ خُبْزَ الْخَمِیرِ

Al-khisal, v 2, p 640

Do Shias believe that all companions of prophet [PBUH] got apostate after prophet [PBUH] passed away?!

“Wahhabi” experts said in their last night’s program that Shias say: “after prophet [PBUH] passed away, all people except four or five persons got apostate”.

An illiterate Shia called them and said: this issue is in Sunni books either, they said: tell us a narrative that shows the apostasy of companions. That Shia guy said that I don’t have Hadith information.

Well, if you don’t have information, you shouldn’t call them. The viewer who had called “Wahhabi” channel last night, if you want to call them again, say this narrative to them:

The view of “Ayesha” prophet’s [PBUH] spouse:

The book “Al-bidayah and al-Nahayah” from “Ibn Kathir” the disciple of “Ibn Taymiyyah”, There’s a narrative from “Ayesha” in this book v 9:

«عَنْ عَائِشَةَ قَالَتْ: لَمَّا قُبِضَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَسَلَّمَ ارْتَدَتِ الْعَرَبُ قَاطِبَةً وَاشْرَأَبَّ النِّفَاقُ»

It’s been quoted from “Ayesha” that when prophet [PBUH] passed away, discord was made amongst Sahabah.

If it’s been quoted in Shia books that just four or five guys remained Muslim after prophet, well, Sunni books introduce all Arab people after prophet [PBUH] as infidel. What do these narratives represent?

The view of “Huzaifah” about Sahabah:

«فإنه قال کان علی عهد النبی نفاق وقد ذهب ولم یبق إلا کفر بعد إیمانوقد ذهب ولم یبق إلا کفر بعد إیمان

At the time of prophet [PBUH], some of companions were hypocrite, the time of hypocrisy passed and after prophet [PBUH] there’s nothing other than blasphemy after paith.

Al-Muhraz al-vajiz, “Ibn Atiyyah” v 5, p 88

He says clearly that companions were believer but after faith, blasphemy wet to them. Do you want us to cite this issue more clearly?! Answer these narratives!

It’s been quoted from “Abu Hurairah” in the book “Mufid al-Mustafid” written by “Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab” who’s the god of “Wahhabism”:

«أن أبا هریرة رضی الله عنه تلا:» (إِذا جاءَ نَصْرُ اللَّهِ وَ الْفَتْحُ وَ رَأَیتَ النَّاسَ یدْخُلُونَ فِی دِینِ اللَّهِ أَفْواجا)

«فقال: "والذی نفسی بیده إن الناس لیخرجون الیوم من دینهم أفواجا کما دخلوا فیه أفواجا"»

…..“Abu Harayrah” said: swear to god whom my life is in his hands, today Muslims leave Islam in throngs as they embraced the religion of god at the time of prophet [PBUH] in throngs.

So far, we’ve quoted narratives from “Ayesha”, “Huzayfah” and “Abu Hurairah” about the blasphemy of the companions, all these narrators are respectable to “Wahhabism”.

“Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab” has quoted above narrative in his book, not only he doesn’t reject it, but he says:

«قف تأمل رحمک الله إذا کان هذا فی زمن التابعین بحضرة أواخر الصحابة»

At the time of “Tabi’in” [those who met some companions of prophet [PBUH] not prophet, and were believer] they would leave Islam in throngs, let alone at our time.

Mufid al-Mustafid, v 1, p 322

Presenter:

Master, was this narrative from “Muhamad ibn Abdulwahhab” or “Ibn Taymiyyah”?

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”:

“Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab” quotes this narrative in his book from “Abu Hurairah”, he says: people would embrace Islam at the time of prophet [PBUH] in throngs, but they leave it at our time.

My dear brothers, write these narratives down, and say them to “Wahhabi” experts. they say: tell us a narrative that shows the apostasy of companions”, well, we said narratives

from “Ayesha”, “Huzayfah” and “Abu Hurairah”.

Companions in the perspective of prophet Muhammad [PBUH]:

I apologize to Sunni, I don’t intend to insult anyone, but when these evil “Wahhabis” question Shia beliefs like this, I’ve no choice unless using of Sunni books.

There’s narrative in the book “Sahih Bukhari” which says:

«عَنِ النَّبِی قَالَ «لَیرِدَنَّ عَلَی نَاسٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِی الْحَوْضَ»«حَتَّی عَرَفْتُهُمُ اخْتُلِجُوا دُونِی»«فَأَقُولُ أَصْحَابِی»«فَیقُولُ لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثُوا بَعْدَک»

Sahih Bukhari, V 21, P 488

«لَیرِدَنَّ عَلَی أَقْوَامٌ أَعْرِفُهُمْ وَیعْرِفُونِی، ثُمَّ یحَالُ بَینِی وَبَینَهُمْ»

I know them and they know me too, but they don’t let them coming to me.

Sahih Bukhari, v 21, p 489

In another narrative, he quotes of prophet [PBUH]:

«فَأَقُولُ إِنَّهُمْ مِنِّی»«فَیقَالُ إِنَّک لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثُوا بَعْدَک»«فَأَقُولُ سُحْقًا سُحْقًا لِمَنْ غَیرَ بَعْدِی»

God, these guys are my companions, god says: you don’t know what innovations they made, then prophet [PBUH] says: down with those who changed after me.

Sahih Bukhari, V 21, P 490

And he quotes of prophet [PBUH] in another narrative:

«عَنِ النَّبِی - صلی الله علیه وسلم - قَالَ «بَینَا أَنَا قَائِمٌ إِذَا زُمْرَةٌ، حَتَّی إِذَا عَرَفْتُهُمْ خَرَجَ رَجُلٌ مِنْ بَینِی وَبَینِهِمْ فَقَالَ هَلُمَّ»«فَقُلْتُ أَینَ»«قَالَ إِلَی النَّارِ وَاللَّهِ»«قُلْتُ وَمَا شَأْنُهُمْ»«قَالَ إِنَّهُمُ ارْتَدُّوا بَعْدَک عَلَی أَدْبَارِهِمُ الْقَهْقَرَی»

Prophet [PBUH] says: I’m beside “Kuwthar” pool and they’re coming to me but they keep them away of me and take them towards Hell. I asked: where are you taking them, they answered: they got apostate after you and returned to the time of ignorance.

“Wahhabis” look for one narrative while we said several narratives, he says in continue:

«فَلاَ أُرَاهُ یخْلُصُ مِنْهُمْ إِلاَّ مِثْلُ هَمَلِ النَّعَمِ»

Amongst my companions, other than limited number of them who will survive and enter the paradise, all will go to the Hell.

Sahih Bukhari, V 21, P 493

“Wahhabis” should answer these narratives, specially last narratives quoted in “Shih Bukhari”.

Prophet says: just limited number of my companions will survive. Some have said: Hadith of “AL-Kuthar” pool is about companions who got apostate after prophet’s [PBUH] death. how many of companions got apostate? There were 124 thousand companions, a few of them got apostate after prophet [PBUH], not all of them!!

Some believe that, the meaning of companions is nation!! Responding to these guys, we quote a narrative from the book “Sahih Bukhari”:

«أَلاَ وَإِنَّهُ یجَاءُ بِرِجَالٍ مِنْ أُمَّتِی فَیؤْخَذُ بِهِمْ ذَاتَ الشِّمَالِ»«فَأَقُولُ یا رَبِّ أُصَیحَابِی»«فَیقَالُ إِنَّک لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثُوا بَعْدَک»

«إِنَّ هَؤُلاَءِ لَمْ یزَالُوا مُرْتَدِّینَ عَلَی أَعْقَابِهِمْ مُنْذُ فَارَقْتَهُمْ»

O prophet, they got apostate, when you left them.

Sahih Bukhari, v 15, p 201

Presenter:

After prophet [PBUH] passed away?

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”:

Yes, “Wahhabis” should answer these issues. These narratives are in Sunni famous books. If they bring a “weak” narrative from the book “Kafi”, we said narratives written in their famous books, people who live in glass house shouldn’t throw stones.

“Wahhabis” might say: “narratives were about people who weren’t well known and belived in him at the end of the life of Prophet [PBUH] or narrative were about companions who got apostate; I’ll say a narrative that shuts their mouth forever.

There is narrative in the book “Sahih Bukhari” that narrator say to “Bira’ ibn Azib” who was amongst the great companions of prophet [PBUH]:

«طُوبَی لَک صَحِبْتَ النَّبِی وَبَایعْتَهُ تَحْتَ الشَّجَرَةِ»«فَقَالَ یا ابْنَ أَخِی إِنَّک لاَ تَدْرِی مَا أَحْدَثْنَا بَعْدَهُ»

Sahih Bukhari, V 14, P 62

Was “Bira’ ibn Azib” amongst companions who got apostate after prophet’s death?! “Wahhabis” say: he was amongst companions who wasn’t well-known and didn’t have high rank!!

“Abu Sa’id Khuderi” says about “Bira’ ibn Azib”:

«لم یکن أحد من أحداث أصحاب رسول اللَّه صلّی اللَّه علیه وسلم أفقه من أبی سعید الخدری»

Amongst the low age companions of prophet [PBUH], no one was as knowledgeable as “Abu Sa’id Khudri”.

Al-esabah fi tamyiz al-Sahabah, ibn Haja Asqalani, V 3, P 66

A narrative’s been quoted from “Abu Said Khudri”:

«هنیئا له برؤیة رسول اللَّه صلّی اللَّه علیه وسلم وصحبته»«قال: إنک لا تدری ما أحدثنا بعده»

Good for you for seeing prophet [PBUH] and talking to him, he said: you don’t know that what innovations we made after prophet [PBUH].

Al-esabah fi tamyiz al-Sahabah, ibn Haja Asqalani, V 3, P 67

were “Abu Sa’id Khudri” and “Bira’ ibn Azim” amongst companions who got apostate?! Talk about Issues which are useful rather than saying a “Weak” narrative from Shia books and claim that there’s no even one narrative in our books about the apostasy of companions!! “Wahabbis” who say such things should pay attention to these issues.

I hope that “Wahhabi” experts review our tonight’s issues by the next week. if it happens and I’ not on trip next week I’ll quote what they have said and will review it. I want the experts of “Wahhabi” channels to read thoroughly what I said in this program regarding to the remarks of “Ahl al-Bayt” and Shia elders, let’s see what they have to say.

Presenter:

Master I have another question, Imam “Sadiq” [AS] would raise capable forces for debate and answering doubts. For instance, if someone would go to Imam “Sadiq” [AS] to get the response of his question, Imam [AS] would send him to one his companions.

Master, please talk about this matter.

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”:

We’ve narratives from Imam “Sadiq” [AS] in which he’s encouraged Shias to answer the doubts of infidels and “Khavarij” and others who make doubt.

Imam Sadiq [AS] says:

«عُلَمَاءُ شِیعَتِنَا مُرَابِطُونَ بِالثَّغْرِ الَّذِی یلِی إِبْلِیسُ وَ عَفَارِیتُهُ یمْنَعُونَهُمْ»

Bihar al-Anvar, V 2

At present time, experts of evil “Wahhabi” channels are the clear instances of Satan who make doubt in the name of expert.

«یمْنَعُونَهُمْ عَنِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَی ضُعَفَاءِ شِیعَتِنَا وَ عَنْ أَنْ یتَسَلَّطَ عَلَیهِمْ إِبْلِیسُ وَ شِیعَتُهُ النَّوَاصِب»

Our Shia scholars don’t let devils to dominate on our Shias with weak belief.

Dear viewers, last night “Wahhabi” experts were only talking nonsense and baselessly without document, they were just chanting.

and compare their program with ours, each and every narrative that we said was with document and cited issue from big scholars such as: “Ibn Kathir” and Sunni famous books like “Sahih Bukhari”.

According to what Imam “Sadiq” [AS] has said the reward of Shia adolescents who learn these issues and put it online to fight evils [Wahhabis] who don’t have parentage who insult Shia Imams [AS], is as follow:

«أَلَا فَمَنِ انْتَصَبَ لِذَلِک مِنْ شِیعَتِنَا کانَ أَفْضَلَ مِمَّنْ جَاهَدَ الرُّومَ وَ التُّرْک وَ الْخَزَرَ أَلْفَ أَلْفِ مَرَّةٍ لِأَنَّهُ یدْفَعُ عَنْ أَدْیانِ مُحِبِّینَا وَ ذَلِک یدْفَعُ عَنْ أَبْدَانِهِمْ»

Anyone who works on the field of defending Shia and answering doubts, his/her reward is more than one million warriors and soldiers who fight on the battle field. Because he defends the religion of our lovers and another one defends from his soul.

Bihar al-Anvar, V 2, P 5

«مَنْ کانَ هَمُّهُ فِی کسْرِ النَّوَاصِبِ عَنِ الْمَسَاکینِ مِنْ شِیعَتِنَا الْمُوَالِینَ لَنَا أَهْلَ الْبَیتِ یکسِرُهُمْ عَنْهُمْ وَ یکشِفُ عَنْ مَخَازِیهِمْ وَ یبَینُ عَوْرَاتِهِمْ» «وَ دُورِهِ یسْتَعْمِلُ بِکلِّ حَرْفٍ مِنْ حُرُوفِ حُجَجِهِ عَلَی أَعْدَاءِ اللَّهِ أَکثَرَ مِنْ عَدَدِ أَهْلِ الدُّنْیا أَمْلَاکاً قُوَّةُ کلِّ وَاحِدٍ تَفْضُلُ عَنْ حَمْلِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَ الْأَرْضِ »

Bihar al-Anvar, V 5, P 10   

In this narrative there two sentences, first: «یکشِفُ عَنْ مَخَازِیهِمْ» that show enmity towards “Ahl al-Bayt”. Second: «یبَینُ عَوْرَاتِهِمْ» that represents decrying the foes of “Ahl al-Bayt”.

Those who insult Shia Imams [AS] and [responding to them] Shias publish issues against their elders and scholars. The act of Shias who put out the pictures of the illegitimate acts of “Wahhabi” scholars including drinking wine and their liaison or the pictures of their lovers’ or spouses’ liaison, is the clear instance of Imam Sadiq’s [AS] narration.

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] has said clearly in the narrative that those who insult Shia Imams [AS] their beliefs and Shias must be decried. Whenever it’s necessary, Shias should talk firmly and reason and debate with infidel scholars along with humiliating and decrying them before people. This is what we did to M.R “Kaljkarab”, he was so arrogant, when he was dealt with according to what Imam “Sadiq” [AS]

had said, he no longer dared to say nonsense and discarded what he used to do.

Someone came to Imam “Sadiq” [AS] from the land of “Navasib” [infidels], and said to Imam [AS]:I want to debate with you. Imam “Sadiq” [AS] told him: on what field do you want to debate?! He said: on the field of “Koranic” science. Imam “Sadiq” [AS] said to “Hamran”: get up and debate with him! That man got upset and said to Imam [AS]: I want to debate with you not “Hamran”, then Imam “Sadiq” [AS] said: if you fail “Hamran”, it’s as if you failed me.

Dear Shias! Honorable students and clergies! I ask you to learn both the knowledge and the rules of debate in the matter of defending “Ahl al-Bayt” [AS].

You have to learn the rules of debate so that Imam “Mahdi” [AS] says to you what Imam

“Sadiq” [AS] said to “Hamran”: “If you fail, I’ve failed!!” this talk Is so valuable.

In continue, that infidel man said: I want to debate about Jurisprudence, Imam “Sadiq” [AS] said to “Zurarah”: “Zurarah” get up, and when that man said: I want to debate on the field of principles of Arab science; Imam [AS] “Sadiq” [AS] said to “Aban ibn Sa’lab” get up and debate.

On any field that that man asked Imam “Sadiq” [AS] to debate, Imam “Sadiq” [AS] had raised expert. Imam “Sadiq’s[AS] experts failed that man, till that man said: I want to debate with you about Imamate thinking of failing Imam “Sadiq” [AS] revenging all his defeats.  Imam “Sadiq” [AS] said to “Hisham ibn Hakam” who was 18-year old adolescent:get up and debate, that man got happy and thought that he can fail him easily. “Hisham” debated him so great that blocked all the way on him, Imam “Sadiq” [AS] said to that man:

«أَمَّا هِشَامُ بْنُ الْحَکمِ فَتَکلَّمَ بِالْحَقِّ فَمَا سَوَّغَک بِرِیقِک»

“Hisham ibn Hakam” debated so great that you couldn’t even ++

Bihar al-Anvar, v 47, p 407

Imam “Sadiq” [AS] has done such work to show us the way that if we want to debate with contemporary infidels that their clear instance is “Wahhabism”, we should have specialty in

the major that we want to debate and to debate with sincere intention.

Presenter:

Thank goodness both “Velayat” global channel and “Imam Mahdi” research institute have progressed a lot on the field of answering doubts. If you refer to this institute website, any doubt that you have, they’ll answer quickly. This is very valuable act.

Some of the messages of viewers:

“Ali” has written: greeting to you and Ayatollah “QAZVINI” who Shias are proud of him, thank you for you great program, you make people to proud of Shias by decrying “Wahhabism” and ruining their reputation.

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”:

Apparently you’ve good relationship with those with the name “Ali”

Presenter:

Yes I have, we enjoy seeing people calling their sons “Ali”, god bless parents who’ve revived this name in their house by selecting this name for their children.

I hope that we can be pattern for our lord commander of faithful [AS] by our attitude and manner.

We have to behave in a way so that “Ali” [AS] is proud of us saying anybody that he’s my Shia and lover.

Viewers’ contact

Viewer: [M.R “Zari’I”- Shia]

Greeting to you, I want to ask two questions.

1: I want to know if this is true that some Sunni imams such as: “Abu Hanifah” and others have said that if someone sleeps with his mother, Islamic punishment isn’t imposed on him and he should even pay her dowry, if this narrative true?

2: it’s said that some Sunni imams like “Imam Malik” have given “Fatwa” that if a woman sleeps with a dog, Islamic punishment isn’t implied on her!! I want to know if Sunni elders

have such “Fatwa”?!

Master, if such issues are in Sunni resources and “Fatwas” or not?!

Ayatollah “QAZVINI”:

“Ibn Hazm Ondulusi” says in the book “Al-mahalli”:

«من تَزَوَّجَ أُمَّهُ آلتی وَلَدَتْهُ»«وَابْنَتَهُ وَأُخْتَه وَجَدَّتَهُ وَعَمَّتَهُ وَخَالَتَهُ وَبِنْتَ أَخِیهِ وَبِنْتَ أُخْتِهِ»«عَالِمًا بِقَرَابَتِهِنَّ منه»«عَالِمًا بِتَحْرِیمِهِنَّ علیه»«وَوَطِئَهُنَّ کلَّهُنَّ»«فَالْوَلَدُ لا حق بِهِ»«وَالْمَهْرُ وَاجِبٌ لَهُنَّ علیه»«وَلَیسَ علیه إِلاَّ التَّعْزِیرُ»

Al-Mahali, “Ibn Hazm”, V 11, P 253

“Khashani Hanafi” says:

«إذَا نَکحَ مَحَارِمَهُ أو الْخَامِسَةَ أو أُخْتَ امْرَأَتِهِ فَوَطِئَهَا لَا حَدَّ علیه عِنْدَ أبی حَنِیفَةَ وَإِنْ عَلِمَ بِالْحُرْمَةِ وَعَلَیهِ التَّعْزِیرُ»

If someone sleeps with his first degree relatives, according to “Abu Hanifah’s Fatwa”, Islamic punishment isn’t imposed on him, however, he knows that it’s Haram.

“Bada’i al-Sana’I, al-Kasani, V 7, P 35

As for his second question, what they’ve said is their “Fatwa”, it’s not a narrative. “Ibn Hazm” says:

«وَلاَ یحُدُّونَ واطیء (((واطئ))) الْبَهِیمَةِ» «وَلاَ الْمَرْأَةَ تَحْمِلُ علی نفس‌ها کلْبًا»«وَکلُّ ذلک إبَاحَةُ فَرْجٍ بِالْبَاطِلِ»«وَلاَ یحُدُّونَ آلتی تزنی وَهِی عَاقِلَةٌ بَالِغَةٌ مُخْتَارَةٌ بِصَبِی لم یبْلُغْ وَیحُدُّونَ الرَّجُلَ إذَا زَنَی بِصَبِیةٍ من سِنِّ ذلک الصَّبِی»

If someone sleeps with an animal, Islamic punishment isn’t imposed on him, same goes to a woman who sleeps with dog. That has done a useless act and didn’t have to do so.

Al-Mahali, ibN Hazm, V 11, P 156

Viewer:

Thank you very much master “QAZVINI”.

Presenter:

Thank you M.R “Zari’i”. Thank you respectable viewers for watching us.

Good luck.

 



Share
* Name:
* Email:
* Comment :
* Security code:
  

Latest Articles
Most Comments
Most viewed
Index | Contact us | Archive | Search | Link | List Comments | About us | RSS | Mobile |